The SHARE SLAM S20 is a professional handheld 3D LiDAR scanner aimed at surveying, architecture and mapping work where teams need colorized point clouds and data that can move into CAD, BIM and 3D tools. Its strongest case is the combination of 1 cm stated relative accuracy, dual cameras and broad export support; its main caveat is that the headline 70 m range applies only under high-reflectivity conditions, while processing still calls for specialist skills. It is worth considering for practitioners who can use that workflow, but it is a poor fit as a casual or plug-and-play 3D capture device.
Prime made for students and young adults
- Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
- Prime Video and Amazon Music included
- Member-only deals
SHARE SLAM S20 Handheld 3D LiDAR Scanner
- ✔ Relative accuracy: 1 cm
- ✔ Scanning range: 0.1–40 m at 10% reflectivity; up to 70 m at 80% reflectivity
- ✔ Field of view: 360° × 59°
Why This Product Stands Out
The S20 stands out as a workflow-oriented handheld scanner, rather than a simple device that captures a 3D view and leaves the rest to a closed app. Color capture helps teams recognize surfaces and site context in a point cloud, while raw data access lets experienced operators adapt processing to their own SLAM methods. Support for established point-cloud and mesh formats gives survey and design teams a route to continue work in familiar CAD, BIM or 3D tools, reducing friction when a scan moves between project stages.
Its stated 1 cm relative accuracy may suit professional documentation where spatial detail matters, and the 360° × 59° field of view offers broad horizontal coverage that can help capture surrounding geometry. Both figures need to be judged against the specific job: the accuracy must meet the deliverable’s tolerances, and the field of view alone does not determine how many passes a site needs. Range also depends on the target. Up to 70 m is specified at 80% reflectivity, while the stated range at 10% reflectivity is 0.1–40 m. Compared with the listed 3DMakerpro Raven, whose stated figures are 50 m and 2 cm with one camera, the S20 has more favorable headline accuracy and camera specifications on paper. That is not enough by itself to establish overall performance; workflow fit, target conditions and validation needs still matter.
The alternative choice changes when the job is different. The listed Livox Mid-360S is a sensor with a 360° × 59° field of view, 200,000 points per second and IP67 rating, so it may suit buyers prioritizing sensor integration and environmental protection. The S20 is more relevant when the need is a handheld capture-to-processing workflow with color and professional export paths. A 3DMakerpro Eagle is another alternative to investigate when a standalone scanner workflow better matches the team; the supplied facts do not provide enough specification detail for a direct performance comparison.
Key Features and What They Mean
Range and accuracy help teams decide whether the S20 can cover a site and produce geometry that fits a deliverable. Its stated 1 cm relative accuracy may benefit professional documentation where spatial detail matters, provided that figure is suitable for the project’s tolerance and conditions. Reach depends on reflectivity: the stated range is 0.1–40 m at 10% reflectivity and up to 70 m at 80%. Operators can use the shorter figure to plan for darker or less reflective targets, avoiding a survey plan built around the best-case maximum.
Dual 1-inch CMOS cameras capture 16 MP per lens, or 32 MP combined. Their color data adds visual clues to point clouds, so surveyors, architects and mapping teams can distinguish surfaces and recognize site context during review instead of interpreting geometry alone. Camera data also supports photogrammetry, giving teams another source of visual information for downstream work. This can make captured records easier to inspect and communicate, though color does not prove that measurements meet a particular project standard.
The 360° × 59° field of view provides broad horizontal coverage. For operators capturing a room or surrounding site geometry, that can reduce the need to point the scanner in many separate horizontal directions and help make capture more efficient. The specification does not show coverage in every orientation or determine how many passes a job requires, so teams should still plan a scan path around the environment.
Format compatibility makes it easier to put captured data to work across existing project tools. Point-cloud output in PLY, LAS, PCD, E57 and RCS, DWG CAD export, and mesh output in 3D Tiles, OSGB, GLB and PLY give design and mapping teams several handoff routes. That flexibility can reduce conversion steps when multiple disciplines need the scan. Buyers should verify that their exact software versions accept the files and preserve the data they need.
Included capture and processing software gives teams a supplied route from scanning through processing and measurement, so they do not need to source every workflow component separately. Raw data access also lets experienced operators build or adapt custom SLAM workflows when a fixed processing path does not suit their methods. This combination is most useful to professional teams with someone able to manage processing; newcomers may need training before the flexibility saves time.
Performance and Real-World Use
In day-to-day professional work, the S20’s value depends on the full chain from capture through processing and delivery. The cameras and broad output options can help a team turn a scan into a colored, measurable dataset that fits existing 3D work. The included software reduces the need to assemble a capture and processing stack from scratch, but the product facts do not establish how quickly a user can learn it or how much processing time a given project will require.
Surface reflectivity affects reach, so operators should plan around the 40 m stated range at 10% reflectivity when conditions are closer to that case, rather than basing a survey plan on the 70 m maximum. Accuracy and range figures are useful starting points, not substitutes for confirming performance against site conditions and deliverable tolerances. Raw data access is a benefit for teams with custom methods; it may add complexity for teams without someone able to manage those methods.
Transport and support also matter. The package weighs 8.71 lb and measures 14.21 × 12.09 × 11.69 in, which indicates a nontrivial kit to move between sites, though the package weight is not the scanner’s operating weight. One included lithium metal battery and a one-year warranty are specified; battery runtime, charging details, accessory availability and longer-term durability are not provided. Buyers with intensive field schedules should confirm those points before relying on it as a primary instrument.
Who Should Buy This
The S20 makes the most sense for surveyors, architecture teams and 3D mapping practitioners who regularly produce point clouds, need color context, and already have a workflow for processing and reviewing LiDAR data. It is especially relevant when raw data access and multiple export formats can feed custom SLAM, CAD, BIM or visualization steps. Those buyers should also have project conditions compatible with the scanner’s stated range and a way to validate that the stated accuracy is suitable for their deliverables.
Who Should Skip This
Skip the S20 if you need a simple, occasional-use scanner that produces a polished result with little training, or if your work depends on reaching 70 m regardless of surface reflectivity. It is also a mismatch for buyers who mainly need an integrated LiDAR sensor for embedded systems; the listed Livox Mid-360S may better match that use case. Teams that prefer a standalone scanning workflow should compare the 3DMakerpro Eagle directly, while buyers focused on the listed Raven specifications may accept its stated 2 cm accuracy and single camera if those tradeoffs meet their job needs.
Value for Money
The S20 is worth its premium price for professional teams that will regularly use its color capture, raw data access, processing software and broad export options to move scans into established design or mapping workflows. In that segment, the bundled workflow and flexibility make a stronger case than the headline range alone: teams can benefit from fewer handoff obstacles and data they can adapt to their own methods. It is less compelling for occasional users, who are unlikely to get enough use from those capabilities to offset the specialist learning curve, conditional long-range performance and substantial kit. Since no verified price is available, the judgment is about fit rather than a price comparison; confirm software compatibility, battery runtime, support terms and performance on expected surfaces before purchase.
SHARE SLAM S20 Handheld 3D LiDAR Scanner
The S20 stands out as a workflow-oriented handheld scanner , rather than a simple device that captures a 3D view and leaves the rest to a closed app. Color capture helps teams recognize surfaces and site context in a point cloud, while raw data access lets experienced operators adapt processing to their own SLAM method
Pros:
- Dual 16 MP cameras capture color alongside LiDAR, making point clouds and photogrammetry more informative for teams that need to identify surfaces and context in a model.
- A stated 1 cm relative accuracy suits professional documentation tasks where spatial detail matters, subject to project conditions and the accuracy actually required.
- Raw data access gives teams room to build or adapt custom SLAM workflows instead of relying only on a fixed processing path.
- Included capture and point cloud processing software provides a route from scanning to measurement and export without sourcing every workflow component separately.
- Support for PLY, LAS, PCD, E57 and RCS point clouds, DWG CAD export, and several mesh formats can ease handoff into varied 3D and design environments.
Cons:
- The 70 m headline range assumes 80% reflectivity; at 10% reflectivity the stated range is 0.1–40 m, which is a meaningful constraint for darker or less reflective targets.
- Professional scanning and processing can demand specialist knowledge, so the included software does not by itself make the system easy for occasional users.
- An 8.71 lb package is substantial to transport, and the provided package weight does not establish the scanner’s in-use weight or comfort over long capture sessions.
- The one-year warranty is a limited ownership safeguard for a tool that may sit in a professional production workflow.
Best for: Surveying, architecture and mapping teams that need color point clouds, raw SLAM data access and CAD/BIM-compatible outputs.
Not ideal for: First-time or occasional users who want simple scanning with little post-processing, or projects that depend on long range over low-reflectivity surfaces.
Bottom line: The SHARE SLAM S20 is worth buying for experienced surveying, architecture and mapping teams that need colorized point clouds, flexible data access and professional export options , and can work within its stated reflectivity-dependent rang
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the S20 scan 70 m in any environment?
No. The stated maximum is up to 70 m at 80% reflectivity. At 10% reflectivity, the stated range is 0.1–40 m, so expected target surfaces matter when planning a job.
Is the S20 suitable for someone new to 3D scanning?
It may be usable by a newcomer, but it is designed around professional capture and processing workflows. Buyers without LiDAR or point-cloud experience should account for a learning period and the possibility of needing specialist help.
What software workflows can use its exports?
The listed formats include point clouds in PLY, LAS, PCD, E57 and RCS, CAD in DWG, and meshes in 3D Tiles, OSGB, GLB and PLY. Check compatibility with the exact software and version used by your team before buying.
Should I choose the S20 over the 3DMakerpro Raven?
The supplied specifications favor the S20 on paper for stated relative accuracy and camera count: 1 cm and dual cameras versus the Raven’s 2 cm and one camera. The Raven’s listed range is 50 m. Compare actual workflow needs, target conditions and required deliverables; these figures alone do not establish which scanner performs better for a particular project.
Does the S20 make sense for embedded sensor integration?
Its handheld capture and processing workflow may be more than an integration-focused project needs. The listed Livox Mid-360S is presented as a LiDAR sensor with 360° × 59° field of view, 200,000 points per second and IP67 rating, so it is a more relevant comparison for buyers prioritizing sensor integration.
Final Thoughts
The SHARE SLAM S20 is worth buying for experienced surveying, architecture and mapping teams that need colorized point clouds, flexible data access and professional export options, and can work within its stated reflectivity-dependent range. Its 1 cm stated relative accuracy is appealing for that segment, but the 70 m maximum is conditional and the workflow is not aimed at effortless casual use. Choose it when those capture and integration strengths solve recurring project needs; skip it when simplicity, low-reflectivity long-range scanning or sensor integration is the main priority.
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
